![]() Generations/Legacy/whatever keeps the traditional gimmicks of the figure. I do want to say though, for those who disagree with me, think of it this way. It's just a hypothetical and I want to know. I do want people to answer the poll whether they like the transforming sword or not, though. I appreciate everyone who commented, regardless of how they feel about the sword. I want to keep the discussion civil, but please sound off on what you think would you prefer a new head and sword coming in an accessory pack so you can just swap the parts out? Or a buzzworthy bumblebee style release, where they change the parts, and maybe ditch the star saber in favor of a bit more paint for the body and plastic for a possible transforming sword? say there was an armada starscream fix coming. solidarity brothers)īut back to the point. ![]() again, hot shot's face looks perfect, and assuming prime and megatron follow that pattern, screamer is going to stand out and not in a good wayĪnd since we've basically got entitled enough to want re-do's for the most minor of things (i'm looking at you people who want sunstreaker because he's not the exact shade of yellow) (, people wanting transmetal 2 megatron to have his show accurate face. it's not bad per se, but it's clearly based off the t30 deluxe and not the animation model. The third and probably the most minor is the head sculpt. The second, possibly more than the sword is swindle's exclusion but there's hints that mark and the team have something planned so we'll have to wait and see for that. it doesn't have to transform the exact same way, but i think it would be preferrable to have it it's cool, and it's his signature weapon. this is especially disappointing after the reveal that hot shot has his cannon. The big thing is that his sword is not from his wing. Okay, so first thing's first, i know armada starscream is barely out there in the wild and not everyone has him, but i think a good number of people are disappointed in certain aspects of the figure
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |